‘PM Modi is scared of youth’: Abhijeet Dipke on way to Delhi for Jantar Mantar protest
Abhijeet Dipke Heads to Delhi Ahead of Jantar Mantar Demonstration
Bharatmorning.com – Cockroach Janta Party founder Abhijeet Dipke left Mumbai for Delhi ahead of a planned protest at Jantar Mantar on Saturday, using the journey to strongly criticise Prime Minister Narendra Modi and defend the group’s right to demonstrate.
Dipke said the arrangements surrounding the planned gathering reflected what he described as concern within the government about young people expressing dissatisfaction. He called the prime minister a “dictator” and questioned why restrictions had been imposed if the government was confident in its public support.
“Narendra Modi is a dictator. He is scared, which is why he has closed the Delhi Metro, roads, everything. If he is this scared of the youth of the nation, why is he sitting in the PM's post?”
The planned event at Jantar Mantar places the focus on political protest in the national capital, where demonstrations often draw attention because of their proximity to Parliament, government offices and other major institutions. The area has long been associated with public gatherings involving activists, political organisations and citizens seeking to raise issues in a visible public forum.
Claim of concern over youth voters
In later remarks to ANI, Dipke expanded on his criticism, saying Modi was worried about the electoral consequences of the situation. He argued that the prime minister feared the public could respond negatively when voting takes place.
“Afraid as he fears that the people of this country will not vote for him after this.”
Dipke’s comments framed the planned protest as part of a broader political disagreement over the role of young citizens in democratic debate. His central contention was that young people should be able to publicly question those in power and express their views without being treated as a threat.
The comments did not set out a wider list of demands for the gathering. Instead, Dipke concentrated on the principle of protest itself, presenting the event as an assertion of democratic participation rather than simply a one-day political action.
Right to peaceful protest
Defending the decision to assemble, Dipke referred to Article 19 of the Constitution and said the group intended to hold a peaceful and democratic protest. Article 19 protects several freedoms for citizens, including freedom of speech and expression, as well as the ability to assemble peacefully and without arms, subject to constitutional limits.
“Protesting is our fundamental right. Article 19 grants us the fundamental right to protest in a democratic and peaceful manner, and that is exactly what we intend to do.”
Public demonstrations can become an important test of how democratic freedoms are exercised in practice. Organisers seek space to make their concerns heard, while authorities are responsible for managing traffic, public safety and access to essential services. The balance between these competing considerations frequently becomes part of the political debate surrounding major protests.
Dipke’s statements made clear that the CJP views the Jantar Mantar event as a legitimate expression of civic rights. By emphasising peaceful conduct, he sought to distinguish the planned action from any suggestion of disorder and place it within the constitutional framework for public assembly.
The protest is expected to bring attention to Dipke’s criticism of the prime minister as well as his appeal to younger citizens. His language was sharply confrontational, but the message he repeatedly stressed was that citizens should retain the ability to gather, speak and challenge elected leaders through democratic means.
Why Jantar Mantar remains significant
Jantar Mantar’s symbolic importance comes from its role as one of Delhi’s best-known locations for public demonstrations. A protest there can give a relatively small political group a national stage, especially when it involves a prominent issue such as constitutional rights, public restrictions or political accountability.
For participants, the gathering offers an opportunity to turn a political message into a visible act of collective expression. For the wider public, such events can prompt discussion about the limits placed on demonstrations, the responsibilities of organisers and the extent to which dissent is protected in a democracy.
Dipke’s departure from Mumbai underlined his intention to personally lead the planned mobilisation in Delhi. The CJP founder positioned the protest as a response to what he described as fear of the country’s youth, while maintaining that the group’s proposed action would remain peaceful.
As Saturday’s event approaches, the central issue raised by Dipke remains the same: whether citizens, particularly younger voters, can use public protest to make their political concerns visible. His remarks linked that question directly to the constitutional promise of peaceful assembly and to the broader debate over accountability in public life.
Related Reading
Frequently Asked Questions
What is PM Modi is scared of youth?PM Modi is scared of youth is the main topic of this guide. The article explains the context, practical details, and next steps readers should understand.
Why does PM Modi is scared of youth matter?PM Modi is scared of youth matters because readers are looking for a useful answer, not just a short summary. Good content should match search intent and help them decide what to do next.